top of page

Terry W. Griffin, PhD Expert Witness

Terry represents both plaintiffs and defendants in agricultural product liability and chemical trespass disputes, providing independent analysis of causation and damages. His work includes evaluating third-party damage claims involving herbicide drift, crop injury, and other agricultural losses by integrating agronomic expertise with digital agriculture technologies. Using satellite imagery, remote sensing data, precision agriculture records, yield monitor data, Actual Production History (APH) information, and on-farm experimentation datasets, Terry quantifies economic damages, assesses production impacts, and develops defensible valuations. This experience allows him to assist attorneys, insurers, agricultural businesses, and producers with objective damage assessments grounded in both field-level evidence and advanced data analytics.

19577403128_9d3f263ae6_o.jpg

Farm data valuation has been an emergent topic across the agricultural sector for several decades. Previous analyses focused on estimating damages from misappropriation, although no existing estimates of valuation within the farm gates for data, especially inaccessible data. Based on actual events when yield monitor data became inaccessible to farm operators, damages were estimated in anticipation of litigation. Valuation was estimated given how yield monitor data was intended to be used in the decision-making process. Specifically, valuation was estimated within the context of conducting farmer-managed on-farm experimentation. Farmers implicitly value on-farm experiments given the financial and non-monetary, i.e. human capital, investments. Key outcomes included 1) farm operators must be perceived to use data and 2) data must be treated as valuable. Each on-farm experiment was valued at over $40,000.

Griffin, T. W.

Off-target herbicide applications, known as chemical trespass, have emerged as an urgent challenge for the agricultural industry. An essential tool for crop protection, herbicides have been vital in maintaining agricultural productivity; however, the unintended consequences of off-target application has led to disputes among farmers, custom applicators, and other stakeholders. Recent media attention and impending litigation regarding off-target herbicide applications motivated the development of rigorous reproducible processes to inform the courts of total economic damages. Calculating economic damages requires upper acreage bounds of adversely affected areas and production differences if no trespass occurred. Herbicides such as glyphosate and dicamba have commonly been associated with chemical trespass disputes. Endowed with only calendar date and location of alleged chemical trespass, publicly available satellite imagery was transformed into evidence suitable to inform the courts of realistic economic damages. The objective of this article is to explore the complexities of chemical trespass, encompassing economic, legal, and technological dimensions, while emphasizing the urgency of bringing awareness to this issue; all in hopes of dispute mitigation.

Griffin, T. W.

© 2026 by Ty G. Griffin.

bottom of page